This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site:

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel

From Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Loading map...
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel logo.png
Headquarters New York (NY)
Number of Offices 3
Number of attorneys 375
Practice Areas General practice
Annual Revenue $$ 325 million"$" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 325. million
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel Pay Scale
(all numbers in thousands of dollars)
First year salary180
Second year salary190
Third year salary210
Fourth year salary235
Fifth year salary260
Sixth year salary280
Seventh year salary300
Eighth year salary315
Ninth year salary325
Tenth year salary

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP is a law firm with offices in New York City, Silicon Valley and Paris.


The Firm was founded in 1968 in New York under the name Kramer, Lowenstein, Nessen & Kamin.[1] Founding members include Arthur Kramer, Louis Lowenstein, Maurice Nessen, and Sherwin Kamin.

When Eugene Nickerson, a descendant of President John Adams, joined the firm, its name changed to Nickerson, Kramer, Lowenstein, Nessen & Kamin. The firm's current name, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, emerged as a result of personnel changes over a number of years, including Nickerson leaving to join the federal bench of the Eastern District of New York, Lou Lowenstein joining the faculty of Columbia Law School, Gary P. Naftalis becoming a name partner, and Marvin E. Frankel, the former Southern District of New York judge, joining the Firm.

The Am Law survey named Kramer Levin one of six growth champions of 2005.[2]

Each department at Kramer Levin, according to a study of the firm by Chambers Associates, has an assigning partner. There is “no formal rotation through the different sub-practices,” meaning that lawyers at the firm can take choose their direction. The juniors that Chambers spoke to had opportunities to work directly for partners.[3]

It has offices in Paris and Silicon Valley, but 95% of its attorneys are based in New York.

Paris office

Kramer Levin also has an office in Paris, France which it acquired in 1999 from the legacy US firm Rogers & Wells which did not want to merge with the rest of the firm to London-based Clifford Chance. The firm maintains strong relationships with other firms throughout the world. There are 35 lawyers at the Paris office, which focuses on finance and corporate law.[3]

Silicon Valley office

In September 2011, Kramer Levin opened its Silicon Valley office in Menlo Park, California, expanding on already well-regarded intellectual property practice.[4]

BLP association

Kramer Levin was the exclusive US referral firm to UK firm Berwin Leighton Paisner from 2000–2007, when the alliance was changed to "preferred firm" status[5] meaning that the two firms would still collaborate but without exclusive referrals. The association had been intended as the prelude to a full merger, but ended because of dissatisfaction on the part of BLP.

Practice Areas

As of 2011, after careful and deliberate growth, the Firm had nearly 375 lawyers, with 20+ practices including in the areas of white-collar defense, securities litigation, corporate, real estate and land use, intellectual property, Lanham Act litigation, business immigration, employment law, financial services, tax, trust and estates and bankruptcy, some of which are among the strongest in the country. The co-heads of the White Collar practice are Gary P. Naftalis and Barry Berke.

In October 2014, Kramer Levin announced that it had hired Jeffrey Mulligan, former executive director of New York City's Board of Standards and Appeals and a former official of the Department of City Planning, as a planning and development specialist in the firm’s Land Use practice.[6]

Complex Litigation Group

In November 2013, Kramer Levin hired John P. “Sean” Coffey to run its Complex Litigation Group. Coffey had attracted the firm's attention with his “aggressive” defense of Goldman Sachs trader Fabrice Tourre in a Manhattan case brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission. “He had devastating cross-examinations. That is a skill that few people have,” said Kramer Levin partner Barry H. Berke.[7] “We are delighted to have an advocate of his extraordinary ability playing a leading role in our litigation group,” firm co-chair Gary Naftalis said.[8]

Intellectual Property Group

Kramer Levin announced in October 2014 that it had expanded its Intellectual Property Group by hiring Christine Willgoos as special counsel. The firm has “nearly 60 attorneys” working in Intellectual Property.[4]

Drone Group

In December 2013, in response to a suggestion by special counsel Brendan Schulman, Kramer Levin became the first law firm with a drone practice.[9] “It became very clear to me that there was a big need for legal advice in this emerging technology market – not just in litigation, but also for businesses interested in developing the technology,” Schulman explained. One of the first clients of the firm's Unmanned Aircraft Systems Practice Group was Raphael Pirker, who had been fined $10,000 by the Federal Aviation Administration for allegedly flying his drone too low and too close to people while making an aerial video for possible use by the University of Virginia. “The commercialization of small drones will be revolutionary and overwhelmingly beneficial,” Brendan Schulman, special counsel at Kramer Levin, said. “The endless list of applications includes photography and cinematography, search-and-rescue, aerial mapping, disaster response, precision agriculture, wildlife monitoring, pipeline inspection, and so on. Tasks that are particularly expensive or dangerous to conduct with manned aircraft, such as crop-dusting, low-altitude cinematography and power line inspection, can be done more safely and cheaply with drone technology.” In April 2014, the Group represented Texas EquuSearch Mounted Search and Recovery Team, which uses camera-bearing drones to find missing people, in a challenge in the Washington, D.C., circuit to a Federal Aviation Administration directive prohibiting this use of drones.[9] [10] [11]

Pro Bono

The firm is well known for its active pro bono program, currently co-chaired by James Grayer and Eric Tirschwell. The firm famously challenged New York State's Domestic Relations law and served with Lambda Legal as co-counsel petitioning the New York Court of Appeals to recognize the rights of same-sex couples to marry. This legal challenge was not successful. In 2010 the firm represented a lesbian high-school student who was denied the right to attend her prom with her girlfriend, wearing a tuxedo.[3]


The Best Lawyers website lists over 70 Kramer Levin lawyers as being among the best in their categories.[12]

In 2013, Chambers USA placed Kramer Levin in its highest category, Band 1,for its Advertising (Nationwide), Bankruptcy/Restructuring (New York), and Immigration (New York) practices, in Band 2 for Litigation (New York) and Real Estate (New York), and Band 4 for Capital Markets (Nationwide), Corporate/M&A (New York), Investment Funds (Nationwide), and Tax (New York).[3]

U.S. News and World Report ranks the firm's national office in Tier 1 nationally in Advertising Law, Banking and Finance Law, and 14 other categories, Tier 2 in eight categories, and Tier 3 in two. The New York office is ranked in Tier 1 in 22 categories, Tier 2 in five categories, and Tier 3 in 2 categories.[12]

In the website's ratings for 2015, Kramer Levin was named #84 in the Vault Law 100. It was #10 on Vault's list of Best Law Firms for Real Estate Law, #13 on Best Law Firms for Bankruptcy, and #14 on Best Law Firms for White Collar Defense and Internal Investigations.[13]

Spencer event

Author Robert Spencer was scheduled to speak in April 2012 at the offices of Kramer Levin about his book Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins, but the firm canceled the event in response to pressure by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Spencer accused Kramer Levin of taking “the cowardly way out” by “allowing these Islamic supremacists to control the discourse and prevent free people from speaking the truth.” Quoting a letter to CAIR by Kramer Levin Executive Director Nicholas J. Tortorella, who wrote that the firm had not been “aware of the controversy surrounding” Spencer, Spencer suggested that it would have been less controversial for them to allow him to speak.[14]


External links