Information for "Contracts/Unclean hands"

Basic information

Display title	Contracts/Unclean hands
Default sort key	Contracts/Unclean hands
Page length (in bytes)	2,331
Page ID	20926
Page content language	en - English
Page content model	wikitext
Indexing by robots	Allowed
Number of redirects to this page	1
Counted as a content page	Yes
Number of subpages of this page	0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Edit	Allow all users (infinite)
Move	Allow all users (infinite)

Page creator	en>WikiWikiWiki
Date of page creation	14:21, December 19, 2004
Latest editor	Lost Student (talk \| contribs)
Date of latest edit	01:45, April 15, 2020
Total number of edits	112
Total number of distinct authors	83
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)	0
Recent number of distinct authors	0

Transcluded templates (7)	Templates used on this page: Contracts/TOC (view source) Template:Cite book (view source) (protected) Template:Cite web (view source) Template:Reflist (view source) (protected) Template:Treatise TOC (view source) Template:Treatise TOC/heading (view source) Template:Treatise TOC/row (view source)

Description	Content
Article description: (`description`) This attribute controls the content of the `description` and `og:description` elements.	Unclean hands, sometimes called the clean hands doctrine or the dirty hands doctrine,[1] is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy because the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint—that is, with "unclean hands".[2] The defendant has the burden of proof to show the plaintiff is not acting in good faith. The doctrine is often stated as "those seeking equity must do equity" or "equity must come with clean hands". This is a matter of protocol, characterised by A. P. Herbert in Uncommon Law by his fictional Judge Mildew saying (as Herbert says, "less elegantly"), "A dirty dog will not have justice by the court".[3]

Information from Extension:WikiSEO