This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Information for "MPEP 706"
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Basic information
| Display title | MPEP 706 |
| Default sort key | MPEP 706 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 224,615 |
| Page ID | 1738 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | WikiSysop (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 00:17, May 18, 2007 |
| Latest editor | Lost Student (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 22:59, May 31, 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 40 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 3 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
| Page transcluded on (1) | Template used on this page: |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | After the application has been read and the claimed invention understood, a prior art search for the claimed invention is made. With the results of the prior art search, including any references provided by the applicant, the patent application should be reviewed and analyzed in conjunction with the state of the prior art to determine whether the claims define a useful, novel, nonobvious, and enabled invention that has been clearly described in the specification. The goal of examination is to clearly articulate any rejection early in the prosecution process so that the applicant has the opportunity to provide evidence of patentability and otherwise reply completely at the earliest opportunity. The examiner then reviews all the evidence, including arguments and evidence responsive to any rejection, before issuing the next Office action. Where the examiner determines that information reasonably necessary for the examination should be required from the applicant under 37 CFR 1.105, such a requirement should generally be made either prior to or with the first Office action on the merits and should follow the procedures in MPEP § 704.10 et seq. |
