Information for "Section 1983 Litigation/Exhaustion of State Remedies: Preiser-Heck Doctrine, Notice of Claim, and Ripeness"

Basic information

Display title	Section 1983 Litigation/Exhaustion of State Remedies: Preiser-Heck Doctrine, Notice of Claim, and Ripeness
Default sort key	Section 1983 Litigation/Exhaustion of State Remedies: Preiser-Heck Doctrine, Notice of Claim, and Ripeness
Page length (in bytes)	23,321
Page ID	21076
Page content language	en - English
Page content model	wikitext
Indexing by robots	Allowed
Number of redirects to this page	0
Counted as a content page	Yes
Number of subpages of this page	0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Edit	Allow all users (infinite)
Move	Allow all users (infinite)

Page creator	Lost Student (talk \| contribs)
Date of page creation	23:56, June 27, 2020
Latest editor	Lost Student (talk \| contribs)
Date of latest edit	02:13, June 28, 2020
Total number of edits	2
Total number of distinct authors	1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)	0
Recent number of distinct authors	0

Transcluded templates (5)	Templates used on this page: Section 1983 Litigation/TOC (view source) Template:Quote (view source) (protected) Template:Treatise TOC (view source) Template:Treatise TOC/heading (view source) Template:Treatise TOC/row (view source)

Description	Content
Article description: (`description`) This attribute controls the content of the `description` and `og:description` elements.	State judicial remedies generally need not be exhausted in order to bring a § 1983 action. “The federal [§ 1983] remedy is supplementary to the state remedy, and the latter need not be first sought and refused before the federal one is invoked.”[1] When a § 1983 plaintiff has pursued a state judicial remedy, or was an involuntary state court litigant (such as a criminal defendant), the state court judgment may be entitled to preclusive effect in the § 1983 action.[2]

Information from Extension:WikiSEO