This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Contracts/Implication-in-fact: Difference between revisions
en>Wikidea No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Such contracts are formed when one party accepts something of value knowing that the other party expects compensation. For example by visiting a doctor, a patient agrees to pay a fair price for the service. If he refuses to pay after being examined, he has breached a contract implied in fact. | Such contracts are formed when one party accepts something of value knowing that the other party expects compensation. For example by visiting a doctor, a patient agrees to pay a fair price for the service. If he refuses to pay after being examined, he has breached a contract implied in fact. | ||
Generally, an implied contract has the same legal force as an express contract. However, it may be more difficult to prove the existence and terms of an implied contract should a dispute arise. In some jurisdictions, contracts involving [[real estate]] may not be created on an implied-in-fact basis. | Generally, an implied contract has the same legal force as an express contract. However, it may be more difficult to prove the existence and terms of an implied contract should a dispute arise. In some jurisdictions, contracts involving [[real estate]] may not be created on an implied-in-fact basis. | ||
Typically, unilateral contracts are the subject matter of these types of contracts where acceptance is being made by beginning a specified task. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 13:14, June 26, 2008
In United States law, an implied-in-fact contract (a form of implied contract) is a contract agreed by non-verbal conduct, rather than by explicit words. The Template:Scotus link defined this in its decision Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592 (1923).[1]. That decision described "an agreement 'implied in fact'" as "founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, their tacit understanding."
Such contracts are formed when one party accepts something of value knowing that the other party expects compensation. For example by visiting a doctor, a patient agrees to pay a fair price for the service. If he refuses to pay after being examined, he has breached a contract implied in fact.
Generally, an implied contract has the same legal force as an express contract. However, it may be more difficult to prove the existence and terms of an implied contract should a dispute arise. In some jurisdictions, contracts involving real estate may not be created on an implied-in-fact basis.
Typically, unilateral contracts are the subject matter of these types of contracts where acceptance is being made by beginning a specified task.
