This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
United States v. Dunn: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=March 1987 |case_treatment=No |facts=2 men were convicted of producing and possessing illegal drugs. Feder...") |
(curtilage) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|reasons=It is okay for law enforcement officer to invade private property fields surrounding the home where a suspect dwells. | |reasons=It is okay for law enforcement officer to invade private property fields surrounding the home where a suspect dwells. | ||
|rule=Open-fields doctrine | |rule=Open-fields doctrine | ||
|comments='''Curtilage''' is the area surrounding the abode where a person sleeps, lives, and eats. The curtilage has less protection than the central home for large residential estates. | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:00, September 18, 2022
| United States v. Dunn | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | March 1987 |
Facts
2 men were convicted of producing and possessing illegal drugs. Federal agent breached a fence to the 198-acre ranch of the suspects. They breached additional fences to peek into a barn not attached to the suspect's home in the property of the suspects.
Holding
Open fields around a home lack the 4th Amendment Constitutional protections of the home.
Reasons
It is okay for law enforcement officer to invade private property fields surrounding the home where a suspect dwells.
Rule
Open-fields doctrine
Comments
Curtilage is the area surrounding the abode where a person sleeps, lives, and eats. The curtilage has less protection than the central home for large residential estates.
