This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Saenz v. Roe: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=May 17, 1999 |subject=Constitutional Liberties |case_treatment=No |facts=In the 1990s, California had the...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Citizens had to meet a 1-year residency requirement to receive the level of benefits which California was doling out. | Citizens had to meet a 1-year residency requirement to receive the level of benefits which California was doling out. | ||
|procedural_history=Sáenz, Director of the California Department of Social Services, loses at the federal district court in California. | |procedural_history=Sáenz, Director of the California Department of Social Services, loses at the federal district court in California. | ||
|comments=*[[Constitutional_Law_Maggs/4th_ed._Outline_II#Saenz_v._Roe_.281999.29]] | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/saenz-v-roe | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/saenz-v-roe | ||
Revision as of 20:04, December 27, 2022
| Saenz v. Roe | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | May 17, 1999 |
Facts
In the 1990s, California had the most generous welfare benefits in the United States.
Citizens had to meet a 1-year residency requirement to receive the level of benefits which California was doling out.Procedural History
Sáenz, Director of the California Department of Social Services, loses at the federal district court in California.
