This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Rust v. Sullivan: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|date=May 23, 1991 | |date=May 23, 1991 | ||
|subject=First Amendment | |subject=First Amendment | ||
|appealed_from=2nd Circuit | |||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=In 1970, [[Congress]] passed [https://opa.hhs.gov/grant-programs/title-x-service-grants/about-title-x-service-grants Title X] (Title 10) of the Public Health Service Act. This is a federal grant program for '''family planning'''. | |facts=In 1970, [[Congress]] passed [https://opa.hhs.gov/grant-programs/title-x-service-grants/about-title-x-service-grants Title X] (Title 10) of the Public Health Service Act. This is a federal grant program for '''family planning'''. |
Revision as of 19:44, January 10, 2023
Rust v. Sullivan | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | May 23, 1991 |
Appealed from | 2nd Circuit |
Facts
In 1970, Congress passed Title X (Title 10) of the Public Health Service Act. This is a federal grant program for family planning.
Title X funds could not be used for the reproductive right to an abortion.
In 1988, the 17th US Health Secretary, Louis Wade Sullivan, announced that family planning clinics can't refer patients for abortion while receiving Title X family planning funds. Sullivan also stipulated that family planning centers under Title X couldn't productive abortion services.Procedural History
Rust (medical care provider) and other filed a lawsuit alleging unconstitutional conditions for receipt of federal funds for family planning.