This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Sherbert v. Verner: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|subject=Constitutional Liberties
|subject=Constitutional Liberties
|case_treatment=No
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Sherbert, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, refused to work on Saturdays. She had been denied unemployment benefits.
|holding=State laws burdening the free exercise rights of people may only stand if there is a compelling state interest.
|holding=State laws burdening the free exercise rights of people may only stand if there is a compelling state interest.
|comments=*[[Constitutional_Law_Maggs/4th_ed._Outline_II#Q1._What_is_a_substantial_burden.3F_.28Sherbert.29]]
|comments=*[[Constitutional_Law_Maggs/4th_ed._Outline_II#Q1._What_is_a_substantial_burden.3F_.28Sherbert.29]]
*[[Reynolds v. United States]], 1879, Mormon polygamy case
*[[Reynolds v. United States]], 1879, Mormon polygamy case
}}
}}

Revision as of 00:13, February 26, 2023

Sherbert v. Verner
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided June 17, 1963

Facts

Sherbert, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, refused to work on Saturdays. She had been denied unemployment benefits.

Holding

State laws burdening the free exercise rights of people may only stand if there is a compelling state interest.

Comments