This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
New York Times v. United States: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=[https://www.ellsberg.net/ Daniel Ellsberg] helped author a top-secret government study, also known as, the [https://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers Pentagon Papers]. | |facts=[https://www.ellsberg.net/ Daniel Ellsberg] helped author a top-secret government study, also known as, the [https://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers Pentagon Papers]. | ||
In 1971, Ellsberg leaked portions of the Report to ''[https://www.nytimes.com/ The New York Times]'' & ''[https://www.washingtonpost.com/ The Washington Post]''. | |||
|issues=Are '''prior restraints''' ever permissible? | |issues=Are '''prior restraints''' ever permissible? | ||
|rule=*[[1st Amendment]]:"Congress shall make no law...abridging the...freedom...of the press..." | |rule=*[[1st Amendment]]:"Congress shall make no law...abridging the...freedom...of the press..." |
Revision as of 18:22, March 2, 2023
New York Times v. United States | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | June 30, 1971 |
Appealed from | DC Circuit |
Facts
Daniel Ellsberg helped author a top-secret government study, also known as, the Pentagon Papers.
In 1971, Ellsberg leaked portions of the Report to The New York Times & The Washington Post.Issues
Are prior restraints ever permissible?
Rule
- 1st Amendment:"Congress shall make no law...abridging the...freedom...of the press..."
Comments
- "New York Times v. United States, better known as the “Pentagon Papers” case, was a decision expanding freedom of the press." (C-SPAN summary)