This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Allen v. Milligan: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=June 8, 2023 |subject=Voting |case_treatment=No |facts=In 2022, the stat of Alabama had 7 federal Congress...")
 
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
|case_text_source=Oyez
|case_text_source=Oyez
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/599/21-1086/
|link=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1086_1co6.pdf
|case_text_source=Justia
|case_text_source=supremecourt.gov
}}
}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 11:31, June 8, 2023

Allen v. Milligan
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided June 8, 2023

Facts

In 2022, the stat of Alabama had 7 federal Congressional districts. Terri Sewell was the only 1 black, female, Democratic member of the House of Representative from Alabama. The other 6 districts were represented by Caucasian Republican men.

Alabama black population in 2023 was 25% black while only 14% (1 out 7) members in the House of Representatives were black.

Procedural History

The plaintiff contended that all black voter were packed into 1 congressional district to produce only 1 Representative who is black.

Issues

Is a race-neutral drawing of congressional district borders allowed if such drawing under-represents a racial group?

Holding

Alabama must re-draw its Congressional districts by factoring in race.

Case Text Links