This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Colorado's anti-discrimination law prohibited discrimination on the basis of romantic orientation. | Colorado's anti-discrimination law prohibited discrimination on the basis of romantic orientation. | ||
|procedural_history=The same-sex couple filed a complaint with the [https://ccrd.colorado.gov/ccrd-home/regulatory-information/colorado-civil-rights-commission Colorado Civil Rights Commission] ("Colorado"). | |procedural_history=The same-sex couple filed a complaint with the [https://ccrd.colorado.gov/ccrd-home/regulatory-information/colorado-civil-rights-commission Colorado Civil Rights Commission] ("Colorado"). | ||
Cakeshop loses in the trial court & Colorado Court of Appeals. | |||
|arguments=Cakeshop argued that serving a wedding cake to the same-sex couple would violate his rights under the [[1st Amendment]]. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/16-111 | |link=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/16-111 |
Revision as of 14:04, June 30, 2023
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | June 4, 2018 |
Facts
Mr. Phillip operated Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. (defendant "Cakeshop") in Colorado. In 2012, a same-sex couple tried to order a wedding cake rom the Cakeshop.
Cakeshop refused to sell a cake to the same-sex couple a wedding cake.
Colorado's anti-discrimination law prohibited discrimination on the basis of romantic orientation.Procedural History
The same-sex couple filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission ("Colorado").
Cakeshop loses in the trial court & Colorado Court of Appeals.Arguments
Cakeshop argued that serving a wedding cake to the same-sex couple would violate his rights under the 1st Amendment.