This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=New Jersey Supreme Court |date=May 9, 1960 |subject=Contracts/Outline |case_treatment=No |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|subject=Contracts/Outline
|subject=Contracts/Outline
|case_treatment=No
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Mr. Henningsen wanted to buy his wife a car for Mother's Day. They visited a Chrysler dealer, Bloomfield Motors, Inc. ("Bloomfield") & selected a 1955 Plymouth sedan.
The purchase contract was an '''integrated contract''' stating "No express or implied warranties are made on the vehicle."
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://casetext.com/case/henningsen-v-bloomfield-motors-inc
|link=https://casetext.com/case/henningsen-v-bloomfield-motors-inc

Revision as of 15:09, July 4, 2023

Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors
Court New Jersey Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided May 9, 1960

Facts

Mr. Henningsen wanted to buy his wife a car for Mother's Day. They visited a Chrysler dealer, Bloomfield Motors, Inc. ("Bloomfield") & selected a 1955 Plymouth sedan.

The purchase contract was an integrated contract stating "No express or implied warranties are made on the vehicle."

Case Text Links