This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Harris v. Blockbuster: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Northern District of Texas |date=April 15, 2009 |subject=Contracts/Outline |case_treatment=No |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link...")
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=April 15, 2009
|date=April 15, 2009
|subject=Contracts/Outline
|subject=Contracts/Outline
|other_subjects=Privacy
|case_treatment=No
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Blockbuster Inc.'s online outlet had a '''click-wrap''' requiring users to agree to "terms & conditions." These terms & conditions includes an (1) arbitration clause, & (2) a class-action waiver.
Blockbuster contracted with Facebook to automatically share the customers' movie rental selections with their Facebook friends.
Ms. Harris claimed that Blockbuster was sharing her rental history at Blockbuster with her Facebook friends without her informed, written consent. Harris claimed a violation of the [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/100/s2361/text Video Privacy Protection Act] (VPPA).
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/harris-v-blockbuster-inc
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/harris-v-blockbuster-inc

Revision as of 20:34, July 5, 2023

Harris v. Blockbuster
Court Northern District of Texas
Citation
Date decided April 15, 2009

Facts

Blockbuster Inc.'s online outlet had a click-wrap requiring users to agree to "terms & conditions." These terms & conditions includes an (1) arbitration clause, & (2) a class-action waiver.

Blockbuster contracted with Facebook to automatically share the customers' movie rental selections with their Facebook friends.

Ms. Harris claimed that Blockbuster was sharing her rental history at Blockbuster with her Facebook friends without her informed, written consent. Harris claimed a violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA).

Case Text Links