This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Missouri v. Biden: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Western District of Louisiana |date=2023 |subject=First Amendment |case_treatment=No |facts=Facebook and other social media de-boosted (or shadow b...")
 
(https://www.fjc.gov/node/4273111)
Line 7: Line 7:
|procedural_history=Eric Schmitt, a Senator from Missouri in 2023, filed suits in 2020 against the Biden administration when he was the [https://ago.mo.gov/ Missouri Attorney General].
|procedural_history=Eric Schmitt, a Senator from Missouri in 2023, filed suits in 2020 against the Biden administration when he was the [https://ago.mo.gov/ Missouri Attorney General].
|issues=Should the executive branch agencies be allowed to tell social media companies to limit misinformation?
|issues=Should the executive branch agencies be allowed to tell social media companies to limit misinformation?
|holding=In July 2023, Judge [https://www.fjc.gov/node/4273111 Terry Doughty] ruled that officials had [https://www.newsweek.com/missouri-v-biden-social-media-ban-explained-1810927 over-stepped their constitutional remit].
}}
}}

Revision as of 09:29, July 8, 2023

Missouri v. Biden
Court Western District of Louisiana
Citation
Date decided 2023

Facts

Facebook and other social media de-boosted (or shadow banned) the "Great Barrington Declaration" on their platforms.

Procedural History

Eric Schmitt, a Senator from Missouri in 2023, filed suits in 2020 against the Biden administration when he was the Missouri Attorney General.

Issues

Should the executive branch agencies be allowed to tell social media companies to limit misinformation?

Holding

In July 2023, Judge Terry Doughty ruled that officials had over-stepped their constitutional remit.