This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
m (Added related case)
m (Text replacement - "|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary" to "|source_type=Video summary |case_text_source=Quimbee")
Line 29: Line 29:
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/masterpiece-cakeshop-ltd-v-colorado-civil-rights-commission
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/masterpiece-cakeshop-ltd-v-colorado-civil-rights-commission
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}
}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 02:53, July 14, 2023

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided June 4, 2018
Related 303 Creative v. Elenis

Facts

Mr. Phillip operated Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. (defendant "Cakeshop") in Colorado. In 2012, a same-sex couple tried to order a custom wedding cake from the Cakeshop.

Cakeshop refused to sell a cake to the same-sex couple a wedding cake.

Colorado's anti-discrimination law prohibited discrimination on the basis of romantic orientation.

Procedural History

The same-sex couple filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission ("Colorado").

Cakeshop loses in the trial court & Colorado Court of Appeals.

The Colorado Supreme Court denied the petition to hear the case.

Issues

Does requiring a Christian baker to make a custom wedding cake for a same-sex couple violate the baker's First Amendment rights?

Arguments

Cakeshop argued that serving a wedding cake to the same-sex couple would violate his rights under the 1st Amendment.

Once commissioner for Colorado commented that religion had been exploited to justify discrimination, slavery, and the Jewish Holocaust.

Holding

Colorado demonstrated hostility toward Cakeshop's sincerely-held anti-LGBT religious beliefs. The 1st Amendment rights of Cakeshop have been violated.

Comments

Case Text Links