This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Wolf v. Colorado: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=Yes " to "") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox Case Brief | {{Infobox Case Brief | ||
|court=Supreme Court of the United States | |court=Supreme Court of the United States | ||
|date=1949 | |date=June 26, 1949 | ||
|subject=Criminal Procedure | |subject=Criminal Procedure | ||
|related=Mapp v. Ohio* Weeks v. United States | |related=Mapp v. Ohio* Weeks v. United States | ||
|facts=Prior to 1949, the 4th Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches & seizures only applied to federal procedures. | |facts=Prior to 1949, the 4th Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches & seizures only applied to federal procedures. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
|issues=Is the [[4th Amendment]]'s '''exclusionary rule''' required in state criminal cases? | |issues=Is the [[4th Amendment]]'s '''exclusionary rule''' required in state criminal cases? | ||
|holding=The [[4th Amendment]] does apply to the states. However, the '''exclusionary rule''' isn't required to be applied in state criminal cases. | |holding=The [[4th Amendment]] does apply to the states. However, the '''exclusionary rule''' isn't required to be applied in state criminal cases. | ||
|reasons=Excluding evidence in state criminal cases isn't necessary to give effect to the 4th Amendment. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/wolf-v-colorado | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/wolf-v-colorado | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |source_type=Video summary | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/338/25/ | |||
|case_text_source=Justia | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:36, July 14, 2023
| Wolf v. Colorado | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | June 26, 1949 |
| Related | Mapp v. Ohio Weeks v. United States |
| Overturned by | |
| Mapp v. Ohio | |
Facts
Prior to 1949, the 4th Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches & seizures only applied to federal procedures.
Without a search warrant, state investigators entered the medical office of Dr. Wolf & seized the names of female patients seen in Denver, Colorado.
After interviewing the patients, the district attorney charged Dr. Wolf with 2 counts of conspiracy to perform abortions. (In the 1940s, abortions were illegal in Colorado.)Procedural History
Dr. Wolf was convicted after 2 jury trials that had resulting from the patients' incriminating testimony.
Dr. Wolf is sentenced to state prison.Issues
Is the 4th Amendment's exclusionary rule required in state criminal cases?
Holding
The 4th Amendment does apply to the states. However, the exclusionary rule isn't required to be applied in state criminal cases.
Reasons
Excluding evidence in state criminal cases isn't necessary to give effect to the 4th Amendment.
