This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Perez v. United States: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
|subject=Constitutional Law
|subject=Constitutional Law
|other_subjects=Commerce clause
|other_subjects=Commerce clause
|case_treatment=No
|appealed_from=New York Appellate Division
|facts=Petitioner was convicted of "loansharking" activities.
|facts=Petitioner was convicted of "loansharking" activities.
|procedural_history=Perez was the loan shark.
A butcher shop owner named Miranda borrowed money from Perez.
|arguments=Loansharks operate similar to organized crime which has a substantially adverse effect on [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Commerce|interstate commerce]].
|arguments=Loansharks operate similar to organized crime which has a substantially adverse effect on [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Commerce|interstate commerce]].
|holding=[[Congress]] has the power to criminalize loan sharking.
|holding= [[Congress]] has the power to criminalize loan sharking.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/146/
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/146/
Line 13: Line 16:
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdqtPgdaKO0
|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdqtPgdaKO0
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/perez-v-united-states-894418301
|case_text_source=vLex.com
}}
}}
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:41, July 14, 2023

Perez v. United States
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided April 26, 1971
Appealed from New York Appellate Division

Facts

Petitioner was convicted of "loansharking" activities.

Procedural History

Perez was the loan shark.

A butcher shop owner named Miranda borrowed money from Perez.

Arguments

Loansharks operate similar to organized crime which has a substantially adverse effect on interstate commerce.

Holding

Congress has the power to criminalize loan sharking.

Case Text Links