This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Supreme Court of N.H. v. Piper: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|date=1985 | |date=1985 | ||
|appealed_from=New Hampshire Supreme Court | |appealed_from=New Hampshire Supreme Court | ||
|facts=Kathryn Piper (plaintiff) lived in Vermont. Piper was 400 yards from the Vermont border with New Hampshire. | |facts=Kathryn Piper (plaintiff) lived in Vermont. Piper was 400 yards from the Vermont border with New Hampshire. | ||
|issues=What is the [[Constitution of the United States|Constitutionality]] of state residency rules for lawyers? | |issues=What is the [[Constitution of the United States|Constitutionality]] of state residency rules for lawyers? | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
|holding=A New Hampshire law making state residency a requirement for admission to the law bar in invalid. | |holding=A New Hampshire law making state residency a requirement for admission to the law bar in invalid. | ||
|reasons=Article 4, Section 2, [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Section_2.2C_Clause_1:_Privileges_and_Immunities|Clause 1: Privileges and Immunities]], requires every State to treat non-state residents without discrimination in the area of economic activity. | |reasons=Article 4, Section 2, [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Section_2.2C_Clause_1:_Privileges_and_Immunities|Clause 1: Privileges and Immunities]], requires every State to treat non-state residents without discrimination in the area of economic activity. | ||
|comments=*''[[Hicklin v. Orbeck]]'' | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/470/274/ | |link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/470/274/ |
Latest revision as of 03:43, July 14, 2023
Supreme Court of N.H. v. Piper | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | 1985 |
Appealed from | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Facts
Kathryn Piper (plaintiff) lived in Vermont. Piper was 400 yards from the Vermont border with New Hampshire.
Issues
What is the Constitutionality of state residency rules for lawyers?
Arguments
A State shouldn't interfere with the ability of out-of-state residents to earn a livelihood.
Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. said that lawyers play an important part in facilitating commerce.Holding
A New Hampshire law making state residency a requirement for admission to the law bar in invalid.
Reasons
Article 4, Section 2, Clause 1: Privileges and Immunities, requires every State to treat non-state residents without discrimination in the area of economic activity.