This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Wheaton v. Peters: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Copyright Law) |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|court=Supreme Court of the United States | |court=Supreme Court of the United States | ||
|date=March 19, 1834 | |date=March 19, 1834 | ||
|subject=Copyright | |subject=Copyright | ||
|facts=Wheaton, the 3rd reporter of decisions for SCOTUS, sued his successor Peters for copyright infringement. | |facts=Wheaton, the 3rd reporter of decisions for SCOTUS, sued his successor Peters for copyright infringement. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023
| Wheaton v. Peters | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | March 19, 1834 |
Facts
Wheaton, the 3rd reporter of decisions for SCOTUS, sued his successor Peters for copyright infringement.
Wheaton had spent massive time and energy on compiling and annotating SCOTUS decisions. After his retirement, Peters gained access to the Wheaton SCOTUS reports, abridged them, and sold them for a profit for himself (Peters).
In the 1830s, no one had Internet access and having access to such annotated summaries of SCOTUS decisions would be highly valuable.Holding
Wheaton had not been granted copyright from the federal government.
