This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|date=2016 | |date=2016 | ||
|subject=Constitutional Law | |subject=Constitutional Law | ||
|holding='''TRAP laws''' (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) impose an '''undue burden''' on pregnant women. TRAP laws in state are unconstitutional. | |holding='''TRAP laws''' (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) impose an '''undue burden''' on pregnant women. TRAP laws in state are unconstitutional. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023
| Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | 2016 |
Holding
TRAP laws (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) impose an undue burden on pregnant women. TRAP laws in state are unconstitutional.
Hellerstedt has been overturned by Dobbs (2022).
