This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Sherbert v. Verner: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|date=June 17, 1963 | |date=June 17, 1963 | ||
|subject=Constitutional Liberties | |subject=Constitutional Liberties | ||
| | |facts=Sherbert, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, refused to work on Saturdays. She had been denied unemployment benefits. | ||
|holding=State laws burdening the free exercise rights of people may only stand if there is a compelling state interest. | |holding=State laws burdening the free exercise rights of people may only stand if there is a compelling state interest. | ||
|comments=*[[Constitutional_Law_Maggs/4th_ed._Outline_II#Q1._What_is_a_substantial_burden.3F_.28Sherbert.29]] | |comments=*[[Constitutional_Law_Maggs/4th_ed._Outline_II#Q1._What_is_a_substantial_burden.3F_.28Sherbert.29]] | ||
* | *[[Reynolds v. United States]], 1879, Mormon polygamy case | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023
Sherbert v. Verner | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | June 17, 1963 |
Facts
Sherbert, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, refused to work on Saturdays. She had been denied unemployment benefits.
Holding
State laws burdening the free exercise rights of people may only stand if there is a compelling state interest.