This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
AND v. Alyeska: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
m (DeRien moved page Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. to AND v. Alyeska: shorten) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Alyeska would transport oil from the northern to the southern parts of Alaska. It purchase a lot of construction supplies. | Alyeska would transport oil from the northern to the southern parts of Alaska. It purchase a lot of construction supplies. | ||
Alyeska asked AND for a letter of proposal for the surplus contruction supplies. | |||
On December 11th 1976, AND sent a letter of intent to Alyeska to purchase its entire [https://www.caterpillar.com/ Caterpillar parts]. | |||
Alaska Northern Development, Inc. ("AND") (plaintiff) was a contracting company. | Alaska Northern Development, Inc. ("AND") (plaintiff) was a contracting company. | ||
Revision as of 16:18, July 17, 2023
| AND v. Alyeska | |
| Court | Alaska Supreme Court |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | June 10, 1983 |
Facts
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. ("Alyeska") was a joint venture owned by several oil companies.
Alyeska would transport oil from the northern to the southern parts of Alaska. It purchase a lot of construction supplies.
Alyeska asked AND for a letter of proposal for the surplus contruction supplies.
On December 11th 1976, AND sent a letter of intent to Alyeska to purchase its entire Caterpillar parts.
Alaska Northern Development, Inc. ("AND") (plaintiff) was a contracting company.
In 1976, AND contacted Alyeska to purchase Alyeska's surplus construction supplies.
