This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Ammons v. Wilson: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


Usually, Wilson would fulfill Ammons's order in 7 days. On 1 occasion, Wilson rejected the order of Ammons without informing Ammons until 12 days later. Wilson explained that the price of shortening had risen to $0.09/pound.
Usually, Wilson would fulfill Ammons's order in 7 days. On 1 occasion, Wilson rejected the order of Ammons without informing Ammons until 12 days later. Wilson explained that the price of shortening had risen to $0.09/pound.
|procedural_history=Ammons sued Wilson for breach of contract.
Ammons lost. The trial court in Mississippi granted Wilson a directed verdict.
|issues=Can a party's silence ever make a contract?
|issues=Can a party's silence ever make a contract?
Can an offeree's (Wilson) silence & in-action be considered an [[Contracts/Acceptance|acceptance]] of an offer?
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/ammons-v-wilson-amp-co
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/ammons-v-wilson-amp-co

Revision as of 13:48, July 26, 2023

Ammons v. Wilson
Court Mississippi Supreme Court
Citation 170 So. 227; 176 Miss. 645 (Miss. 1936)
Date decided December 7, 1936

Facts

Mr. Ammons, a wholesale grocer, ordered 942 cases of shortening at $0.075/pound from Mr. Tweedy, a Wilson & Company ("Wilson") salesman.

Wilson's customers, including Ammons, understood that their orders weren't binding until Wilson had received & accepted them.

Usually, Wilson would fulfill Ammons's order in 7 days. On 1 occasion, Wilson rejected the order of Ammons without informing Ammons until 12 days later. Wilson explained that the price of shortening had risen to $0.09/pound.

Procedural History

Ammons sued Wilson for breach of contract.

Ammons lost. The trial court in Mississippi granted Wilson a directed verdict.

Issues

Can a party's silence ever make a contract?

Can an offeree's (Wilson) silence & in-action be considered an acceptance of an offer?

Case Text Links