This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Blinn v. Beatrice Hospital: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|facts=Mr. Blinn was an at-will employee; he was 67 years old. His employer was [https://beatricecommunityhospital.com/ Beatrice Community Hospital and Health Center, Inc.] ("Beatrice"). | |facts=Mr. Blinn was an at-will employee; he was 67 years old. His employer was [https://beatricecommunityhospital.com/ Beatrice Community Hospital and Health Center, Inc.] ("Beatrice"). | ||
In June 2002, Blinn received a job offer from another hospital in Kansas. However, after obtaining assurances from Beatrice that his job with Beatrice was secure, Blinn decide the job offer from the Kansas hospital. | |||
|issues=Can an at-will employee maintain an action for [[promissory estoppel]]? | |issues=Can an at-will employee maintain an action for [[promissory estoppel]]? | ||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |
Revision as of 18:47, August 8, 2023
Blinn v. Beatrice Hospital | |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | 708 N.W.2d 235 |
Date decided | January 6, 2006 |
Facts
Mr. Blinn was an at-will employee; he was 67 years old. His employer was Beatrice Community Hospital and Health Center, Inc. ("Beatrice").
In June 2002, Blinn received a job offer from another hospital in Kansas. However, after obtaining assurances from Beatrice that his job with Beatrice was secure, Blinn decide the job offer from the Kansas hospital.Issues
Can an at-will employee maintain an action for promissory estoppel?