This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Cellphone Termination Fee Cases: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=California Court of Appeal for the First District |citation=193 Cal.App.4th 298 |date=March 3, 2011 |subject=Contracts |case_text_links={{Infobox C...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=March 3, 2011 | |date=March 3, 2011 | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|facts=Sprint Corporation charged early termination fees (ETFs) for its cell phone clients. | |||
Sprint offered cell phone contracts lasting 1 or 2 years. ETFs could be $200. | |||
|procedural_history=Sprint customers filed a class-action lawsuit. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://casetext.com/case/cellphone-fee-termination-cases | |link=https://casetext.com/case/cellphone-fee-termination-cases | ||
Revision as of 12:46, August 30, 2023
| Cellphone Termination Fee Cases | |
| Court | California Court of Appeal for the First District |
|---|---|
| Citation | 193 Cal.App.4th 298 |
| Date decided | March 3, 2011 |
Facts
Sprint Corporation charged early termination fees (ETFs) for its cell phone clients.
Sprint offered cell phone contracts lasting 1 or 2 years. ETFs could be $200.Procedural History
Sprint customers filed a class-action lawsuit.
