This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Cellphone Termination Fee Cases: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
Sprint offered cell phone contracts lasting 1 or 2 years. ETFs could be $200.
Sprint offered cell phone contracts lasting 1 or 2 years. ETFs could be $200.
|procedural_history=Sprint customers filed a class-action lawsuit.
|procedural_history=Sprint customers filed a class-action lawsuit.
The jury found that Sprint had collected over $73 million dollars in ETFs from the class members. These early terminations had in turn cost Sprint $225 million in damages.
The trial judge found the ETFs [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/liquidated-damages Liquidated Damages] (a penalty).
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://casetext.com/case/cellphone-fee-termination-cases
|link=https://casetext.com/case/cellphone-fee-termination-cases

Revision as of 12:50, August 30, 2023

Cellphone Termination Fee Cases
Court California Court of Appeal for the First District
Citation 193 Cal.App.4th 298
Date decided March 3, 2011

Facts

Sprint Corporation charged early termination fees (ETFs) for its cell phone clients.

Sprint offered cell phone contracts lasting 1 or 2 years. ETFs could be $200.

Procedural History

Sprint customers filed a class-action lawsuit.

The jury found that Sprint had collected over $73 million dollars in ETFs from the class members. These early terminations had in turn cost Sprint $225 million in damages.

The trial judge found the ETFs Liquidated Damages (a penalty).

Case Text Links