This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Cellphone Termination Fee Cases: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The trial judge found the ETFs [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/liquidated-damages Liquidated Damages] (a penalty). | The trial judge found the ETFs [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/liquidated-damages Liquidated Damages] (a penalty). | ||
The trial court enjoined (prohibited) Sprint from collecting additional early termination fees (ETFs); Sprint was ordered to cough back $73 million in restitution. At the same time, the $225 million damages were to be offset in Sprint's favor. To sum it, the court announced that neither party would be allowed to recover anything. | |||
The customers demanded a new trial. | |||
|issues=Can the presumption against a liquidated-damages provision in a consumer contract be overcome without evidence that the proponent conducted an analysis attempting to match the damages to its actual losses? | |||
|holding=No. The presumption against liquidated-damages provisions in a consumer contracts can't be overcome unless the proponent shows it conducted an analysis attempting to match the damages to its actual losses. | |||
|comments=Sprint Corporation was merged into T-Mobile US in April 2020. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://casetext.com/case/cellphone-fee-termination-cases | |link=https://casetext.com/case/cellphone-fee-termination-cases | ||
Revision as of 12:59, August 30, 2023
| Cellphone Termination Fee Cases | |
| Court | California Court of Appeal for the First District |
|---|---|
| Citation | 193 Cal.App.4th 298 |
| Date decided | March 3, 2011 |
Facts
Sprint Corporation charged early termination fees (ETFs) for its cell phone clients.
Sprint offered cell phone contracts lasting 1 or 2 years. ETFs could be $200.Procedural History
Sprint customers filed a class-action lawsuit.
The jury found that Sprint had collected over $73 million dollars in ETFs from the class members. These early terminations had in turn cost Sprint $225 million in damages.
The trial judge found the ETFs Liquidated Damages (a penalty).
The trial court enjoined (prohibited) Sprint from collecting additional early termination fees (ETFs); Sprint was ordered to cough back $73 million in restitution. At the same time, the $225 million damages were to be offset in Sprint's favor. To sum it, the court announced that neither party would be allowed to recover anything.
The customers demanded a new trial.
