This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=May 29, 1973 |appealed_from=California courts |case_treatment=No |holding=Government agents aren't require...") |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|date=May 29, 1973 | |date=May 29, 1973 | ||
|appealed_from=California courts | |appealed_from=California courts | ||
|holding=Government agents aren't required to tell people of their Constitutional rights to refuse consent. | |holding=Government agents aren't required to tell people of their Constitutional rights to refuse consent. | ||
|rule=Consent searches (or consensual searches) are legally okay in the United States. | |rule=Consent searches (or consensual searches) are legally okay in the United States. | ||
|comments=*[[Criminal_Procedure#Consent_Searches]] | |comments=*[[Criminal_Procedure#Consent_Searches]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:40, July 14, 2023
| Schneckloth v. Bustamonte | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | May 29, 1973 |
| Appealed from | California courts |
Holding
Government agents aren't required to tell people of their Constitutional rights to refuse consent.
Rule
Consent searches (or consensual searches) are legally okay in the United States.
