This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Williams v. State of North Carolina (1942): Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=Yes " to "")
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=December 21, 1942
|date=December 21, 1942
|subject=Family Law
|subject=Family Law
|case_treatment=No
|appealed_from=North Carolina Supreme Court
|overturned=Haddock v. Haddock
|facts=2 North Carolina residents Williams & Hendrix married each other people traveled together to Las Vegas, Nevada, in May 1940.
 
In June 1940, Williams & Hendrix divorced their former spouses to marry each other. The newly-wed couple in Nevada had their former spouses outside of Nevada. Mrs. Williams was served divorce papers in North Carolina. The 2 former spouses ignored the Nevada divorce proceedings. 
 
The marriage of Williams & Hendrix was recognized by a Nevada court. However, they returned to North Carolina where they were charged with bigamy.
|procedural_history=The trial court & North Carolina Supreme Court convicts the Williams & Hendrix couple of bigamy.
|issues=When must a state honor a [[American marriage laws|divorce]] decree issued by another state?
|issues=When must a state honor a [[American marriage laws|divorce]] decree issued by another state?
|arguments=The prosecution argued that North Carolina isn't supposed to recognize the Nevada divorce because the North Carolina former spouses weren't served in Nevada & didn't appear in a Nevada court.
|holding=The [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/full-faith-and-credit Full Faith and Credit] Clause ([[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Article_4_.28States.29:_4_sections|Article IV, § 1]]) requires a state to honor another state's divorce decree.
|rule=Courts exercise jurisdiction over marriage under [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/in-rem-jurisdiction In Rem] jurisdiction where the "thing" is the "marriage."
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/317/287/
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/317/287/
Line 10: Line 20:
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/williams-v-state-of-north-carolina-i
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/williams-v-state-of-north-carolina-i
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}
}}
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:36, July 14, 2023

Williams v. State of North Carolina (1942)
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided December 21, 1942
Appealed from North Carolina Supreme Court
Overturned Haddock v. Haddock
Followed by
Williams v. State of North Carolina (1945)

Facts

2 North Carolina residents Williams & Hendrix married each other people traveled together to Las Vegas, Nevada, in May 1940.

In June 1940, Williams & Hendrix divorced their former spouses to marry each other. The newly-wed couple in Nevada had their former spouses outside of Nevada. Mrs. Williams was served divorce papers in North Carolina. The 2 former spouses ignored the Nevada divorce proceedings.

The marriage of Williams & Hendrix was recognized by a Nevada court. However, they returned to North Carolina where they were charged with bigamy.

Procedural History

The trial court & North Carolina Supreme Court convicts the Williams & Hendrix couple of bigamy.

Issues

When must a state honor a divorce decree issued by another state?

Arguments

The prosecution argued that North Carolina isn't supposed to recognize the Nevada divorce because the North Carolina former spouses weren't served in Nevada & didn't appear in a Nevada court.

Holding

The Full Faith and Credit Clause (Article IV, § 1) requires a state to honor another state's divorce decree.

Rule

Courts exercise jurisdiction over marriage under In Rem jurisdiction where the "thing" is the "marriage."

Case Text Links