This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Boise Junior College v. Mattefs Construction: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
m (DeRien moved page Boise Junior College District v. Mattefs Construction Co. to Boise Junior College v. Mattefs Construction: shorten) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 17:18, August 11, 2023
Boise Junior College v. Mattefs Construction | |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | 450 P.2d 604 |
Date decided | February 7, 1969 |
Facts
Mattefs Construction Company ("Mattefs") submitted a bid of $141,048 to Boise Junior College District ("Boise") for a Boise construction project.
However, in calculating its bid, Mattefs had mitakenly omitted the cost of glass & windows. The lowest bid Mattefs had received from its glass & windows sub-contractors was $19,741.
Procedural History
Boise entered into a construction contract with the next-highest bid & simultaneously sued Mattefs on the bid bond with Matteffs over the $7,000 bid difference.
The trial court ruled that Mattes was entitled to rescission because it has under-estimated its bid by accident. Boise lost.Issues
Is a bidder who makes a clerical error in preparing a bid entitled to the equitable remedy of rescission?
Holding
Yes. A bidder who makes an innocent error in preparing a bid may be entitled to rescission.