This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=U.S. Supreme Court |date=June 27, 2005 |subject=Administrative Law |case_treatment=No |holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a...") |
(Administrative_Law_Breyer/Outline#Natl_Cable_and_Telecomm_Assoc._v._Brand_X_.282005.29) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network. | |holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network. | ||
|comments=This case is shortened to the ''Brand X'' case. | |comments=This case is shortened to the ''Brand X'' case. | ||
*[[Administrative_Law_Breyer/Outline#Natl_Cable_and_Telecomm_Assoc._v._Brand_X_.282005.29]] | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUyWfKMQr98 | |link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUyWfKMQr98 |
Revision as of 21:55, November 7, 2022
National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services | |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | June 27, 2005 |
Holding
Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network.
Comments
This case is shortened to the Brand X case.