This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=U.S. Supreme Court |date=June 27, 2005 |subject=Administrative Law |case_treatment=No |holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a...")
 
(Administrative_Law_Breyer/Outline#Natl_Cable_and_Telecomm_Assoc._v._Brand_X_.282005.29)
Line 6: Line 6:
|holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network.
|holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network.
|comments=This case is shortened to the ''Brand X'' case.
|comments=This case is shortened to the ''Brand X'' case.
*[[Administrative_Law_Breyer/Outline#Natl_Cable_and_Telecomm_Assoc._v._Brand_X_.282005.29]]
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUyWfKMQr98
|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUyWfKMQr98

Revision as of 21:55, November 7, 2022

National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services
Court U.S. Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided June 27, 2005

Holding

Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network.

Comments

Case Text Links