This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Administrative_Law_Breyer/Outline#Natl_Cable_and_Telecomm_Assoc._v._Brand_X_.282005.29) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=Administrative Law | |subject=Administrative Law | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|issues=Are cable providers bound by the principle of '''network neutrality'''? | |||
|holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network. | |holding=Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network. | ||
|comments=This case is shortened to the ''Brand X'' case. | |comments=This case is shortened to the ''Brand X'' case. | ||
Revision as of 21:57, November 7, 2022
| National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services | |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | June 27, 2005 |
Issues
Are cable providers bound by the principle of network neutrality?
Holding
Cable broadband providers such as Comcast were not a "telecommunications service” ; these companies are an “information service”; consequently, cable service providers have the freedom to keep competitors off their network.
Comments
This case is shortened to the Brand X case.
