This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Skinner v. Oklahoma: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=June 1, 1942 |subject=Health Law |case_treatment=No |facts=Jack Skinner stole some chickens in the 1930s i...")
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=June 1, 1942
|date=June 1, 1942
|subject=Health Law
|subject=Health Law
|case_treatment=No
|appealed_from=Oklahoma Supreme Court
|case_treatment=Yes
|overturned=Buck v. Bell
|facts=Jack Skinner stole some chickens in the 1930s in Oklahoma. It was his 3rd theft. He was ordered to be sterilized as punishment because of the 3-strike law in effect in Oklahoma at the time.
|facts=Jack Skinner stole some chickens in the 1930s in Oklahoma. It was his 3rd theft. He was ordered to be sterilized as punishment because of the 3-strike law in effect in Oklahoma at the time.
|holding=In spite of Skinner habitual thievery, his right to procreate under the Equal Protection clause in the [[14th Amendment]] have been violated.
|comments=*[[Constitutional_Liberties#Skinner_v._Oklahoma]]
|comments=*[[Constitutional_Liberties#Skinner_v._Oklahoma]]
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link

Revision as of 13:49, March 5, 2023

Skinner v. Oklahoma
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided June 1, 1942
Appealed from Oklahoma Supreme Court
Overturned Buck v. Bell

Facts

Jack Skinner stole some chickens in the 1930s in Oklahoma. It was his 3rd theft. He was ordered to be sterilized as punishment because of the 3-strike law in effect in Oklahoma at the time.

Holding

In spite of Skinner habitual thievery, his right to procreate under the Equal Protection clause in the 14th Amendment have been violated.

Comments

Case Text Links