This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Lindsey v. Clark: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|case_treatment=No
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Floyd Clark owned 4 adjoining lots with his wife Helen. In 1937, the Clark couple conveyed 2 of the adjoining lots to their daughter & her husband.
|facts=Floyd Clark owned 4 adjoining lots with his wife Helen. In 1937, the Clark couple conveyed 2 of the adjoining lots to their daughter & her husband.
The Clark progeny couple sold their lots with a Clark easement to Lindsey in 1944. The 1944 deed didn't specify any easement!
|rule="Use it or lose it" is the maxim related to an abandonment of an [[easement]]; on the other hand, verbally informing the property owner of the plan to not use an easement any longer is '''release'''.
|rule="Use it or lose it" is the maxim related to an abandonment of an [[easement]]; on the other hand, verbally informing the property owner of the plan to not use an easement any longer is '''release'''.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link

Revision as of 16:18, April 9, 2023

Lindsey v. Clark
Court Virginia Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided March 10, 1952

Facts

Floyd Clark owned 4 adjoining lots with his wife Helen. In 1937, the Clark couple conveyed 2 of the adjoining lots to their daughter & her husband.

The Clark progeny couple sold their lots with a Clark easement to Lindsey in 1944. The 1944 deed didn't specify any easement!

Rule

"Use it or lose it" is the maxim related to an abandonment of an easement; on the other hand, verbally informing the property owner of the plan to not use an easement any longer is release.

Case Text Links