This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Olmstead v. United States: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=Constitutional Liberties | |subject=Constitutional Liberties | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=During the 1920s Prohibition era, several people led by Olmstead were involved in a bootlegging operation to import liquor from Canada. | |||
Without a search warrant, police officers tapped into the telephone wires going into the suspects' homes. (The officers didn't enter the homes of the suspects.) | |||
Over 5 months, the officers gathered evidence using the intercepted phone calls to Olmstead. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/olmstead-v-united-states | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/olmstead-v-united-states |
Revision as of 18:55, June 5, 2023
Olmstead v. United States | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | 1928 |
Overturned by | |
Katz v. United States |
Facts
During the 1920s Prohibition era, several people led by Olmstead were involved in a bootlegging operation to import liquor from Canada.
Without a search warrant, police officers tapped into the telephone wires going into the suspects' homes. (The officers didn't enter the homes of the suspects.)
Over 5 months, the officers gathered evidence using the intercepted phone calls to Olmstead.Case Text Links
-