This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=New Jersey Supreme Court |date=May 9, 1960 |subject=Contracts/Outline |case_treatment=No |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=Contracts/Outline | |subject=Contracts/Outline | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=Mr. Henningsen wanted to buy his wife a car for Mother's Day. They visited a Chrysler dealer, Bloomfield Motors, Inc. ("Bloomfield") & selected a 1955 Plymouth sedan. | |||
The purchase contract was an '''integrated contract''' stating "No express or implied warranties are made on the vehicle." | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://casetext.com/case/henningsen-v-bloomfield-motors-inc | |link=https://casetext.com/case/henningsen-v-bloomfield-motors-inc |
Revision as of 15:09, July 4, 2023
Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors | |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | May 9, 1960 |
Facts
Mr. Henningsen wanted to buy his wife a car for Mother's Day. They visited a Chrysler dealer, Bloomfield Motors, Inc. ("Bloomfield") & selected a 1955 Plymouth sedan.
The purchase contract was an integrated contract stating "No express or implied warranties are made on the vehicle."