This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
McMichael v. Price: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
(https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/mutuality-of-obligation) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
After 5 months, McMichael refused to began sands. | After 5 months, McMichael refused to began sands. | ||
|procedural_history=Price sued McMichael for breach of contract. | |procedural_history=Price sued McMichael for breach of contract. | ||
McMichael answered that the contract lacked [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/mutuality-of-obligation Mutuality of Obligation]. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://casetext.com/case/mcmichael-v-price | |link=https://casetext.com/case/mcmichael-v-price | ||
Revision as of 17:53, July 6, 2023
| McMichael v. Price | |
| Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | May 5, 1936 |
Facts
McMichael (defendant) had sand mining operation in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Mr. Price (plaintiff) bought sand locally in Tulsa & shipped it across the United States.
The 2 parties entered a requirements contract whereby McMichael would provide as much sand as Price required.
McMichael (supplier) agreed to supply all the sand that Price could sell over the next 10 years. Price would pay 60% of the market price at the sand's destination.
After 5 months, McMichael refused to began sands.Procedural History
Price sued McMichael for breach of contract.
McMichael answered that the contract lacked Mutuality of Obligation.
