This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

McMichael v. Price: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/mutuality-of-obligation)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
|procedural_history=Price sued McMichael for breach of contract.
|procedural_history=Price sued McMichael for breach of contract.


McMichael answered that the contract lacked [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/mutuality-of-obligation Mutuality of Obligation].
McMichael answered that the contract lacked [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/mutuality-of-obligation Mutuality of Obligation]. McMichael lost.
|issues=Is a contract requiring a seller (McMichael) to provide as many goods as the buyer (Price) requires void for lack of Mutuality of Obligation?
|holding=No. There is Mutuality of Obligation if the contract binds each party, making each party's performance mandatory, not discretionary.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://casetext.com/case/mcmichael-v-price
|link=https://casetext.com/case/mcmichael-v-price

Revision as of 17:56, July 6, 2023

McMichael v. Price
Court Oklahoma Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided May 5, 1936

Facts

McMichael (defendant) had sand mining operation in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Mr. Price (plaintiff) bought sand locally in Tulsa & shipped it across the United States.

The 2 parties entered a requirements contract whereby McMichael would provide as much sand as Price required.

McMichael (supplier) agreed to supply all the sand that Price could sell over the next 10 years. Price would pay 60% of the market price at the sand's destination.

After 5 months, McMichael refused to began sands.

Procedural History

Price sued McMichael for breach of contract.

McMichael answered that the contract lacked Mutuality of Obligation. McMichael lost.

Issues

Is a contract requiring a seller (McMichael) to provide as many goods as the buyer (Price) requires void for lack of Mutuality of Obligation?

Holding

No. There is Mutuality of Obligation if the contract binds each party, making each party's performance mandatory, not discretionary.

Case Text Links