This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1965): Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
|followed=Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1964)
|followed=Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1964)
|facts=Walker-Thomas was a rent-to-own retailer. He considered all payments made by his customers rental payments until the items were paid for in full.
|facts=Walker-Thomas was a rent-to-own retailer. He considered all payments made by his customers rental payments until the items were paid for in full.
Customer's maintained a cumulative balance of all their items. If a customer purchased a $800 item while still having a $50, then all the customer's purchases would have been regarded as un-paid.


During the period from 1957 to 1962, Ms. Williams had purchased furniture and appliances from Walker-Thomas.
During the period from 1957 to 1962, Ms. Williams had purchased furniture and appliances from Walker-Thomas.

Revision as of 16:30, July 9, 2023

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1965)
Court US of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Citation
Date decided August 11, 1965
Overturned Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1964)
Followed Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1964)

Facts

Walker-Thomas was a rent-to-own retailer. He considered all payments made by his customers rental payments until the items were paid for in full.

Customer's maintained a cumulative balance of all their items. If a customer purchased a $800 item while still having a $50, then all the customer's purchases would have been regarded as un-paid.

During the period from 1957 to 1962, Ms. Williams had purchased furniture and appliances from Walker-Thomas.

Procedural History

Case Text Links