This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Buffaloe v. Hart: Difference between revisions
Lost Student (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary" to "|source_type=Video summary |case_text_source=Quimbee") |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/buffaloe-v-hart | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/buffaloe-v-hart | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |source_type=Video summary | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://casetext.com/case/buffaloe-v-hart | |link=https://casetext.com/case/buffaloe-v-hart |
Revision as of 03:00, July 14, 2023
Buffaloe v. Hart | |
Court | Court of Appeals of North Carolina |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | 1994-3-1 |
Facts
Mr. Buffaloe was a tobacco farmer who rented 5 barns from the Hart couple.
The 2 parties, Buffaloe & Hart, had a handshake agreement without a written contract.
Buffaloe began negotiations to purchase the barns. He proposed & paid the 1st of 4 installments of $5,000 to purchase the barns (for a total of $20,000).
Bufalloe applied for a loan to pay the remaining $15,000. The bank didn't approve the loans. Nevertheless, he entered into an agreement to sell 3 of the 5 barns to 3rd parties & informed Hart.
The following day, Hart informed Buffaloe that the barns had been sold & returned Buffaloe's check.Procedural History
Buffaloe sued the Harts for breach of contract in state court.
The Harts answered that there wasn't a breach of contract based on the statute of frauds.
The jury decides in favor of Buffaloe.