This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Minnesota v. Dickerson: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=June 7, 1993 |appealed_from=Minnesota courts |case_treatment=No |facts=A police officer conducted a pat-do...")
 
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=June 7, 1993
|date=June 7, 1993
|appealed_from=Minnesota courts
|appealed_from=Minnesota courts
|case_treatment=No
|facts=A police officer conducted a pat-down and found something that wasn't a weapon. The officer discovered crack cocaine on the subject.
|facts=A police officer conducted a pat-down and found something that wasn't a weapon. The officer discovered crack cocaine on the subject.
|holding=An officer is authorized to search and arrest a person if a contraband such as an illegal drug is found while doing a pat-down.
|holding=An officer is authorized to search and arrest a person if a contraband such as an illegal drug is found while doing a pat-down.
|comments=*[[Criminal_Procedure#Grounds_for_Temporary_Seizure_for_Investigation]]
|comments=*[[Criminal_Procedure#Grounds_for_Temporary_Seizure_for_Investigation]]
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:39, July 14, 2023

Minnesota v. Dickerson
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided June 7, 1993
Appealed from Minnesota courts

Facts

A police officer conducted a pat-down and found something that wasn't a weapon. The officer discovered crack cocaine on the subject.

Holding

An officer is authorized to search and arrest a person if a contraband such as an illegal drug is found while doing a pat-down.

Comments