This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

United States v. Dunn: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(curtilage)
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
|court=Supreme Court of the United States
|court=Supreme Court of the United States
|date=March 1987
|date=March 1987
|case_treatment=No
|facts=2 men were convicted of producing and possessing illegal drugs. Federal agent breached a fence to the 198-acre ranch of the suspects. They breached additional fences to peek into a barn not attached to the suspect's home in the property of the suspects.
|facts=2 men were convicted of producing and possessing illegal drugs. Federal agent breached a fence to the 198-acre ranch of the suspects. They breached additional fences to peek into a barn not attached to the suspect's home in the property of the suspects.
|holding=Open fields around a home lack the 4th Amendment Constitutional protections of the home.
|holding=Open fields around a home lack the 4th Amendment Constitutional protections of the home.

Latest revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023

United States v. Dunn
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided March 1987

Facts

2 men were convicted of producing and possessing illegal drugs. Federal agent breached a fence to the 198-acre ranch of the suspects. They breached additional fences to peek into a barn not attached to the suspect's home in the property of the suspects.

Holding

Open fields around a home lack the 4th Amendment Constitutional protections of the home.

Reasons

It is okay for law enforcement officer to invade private property fields surrounding the home where a suspect dwells.

Rule

Open-fields doctrine

Comments

Curtilage is the area surrounding the abode where a person sleeps, lives, and eats. The curtilage has less protection than the central home for large residential estates.