This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
Thompson v. Libbey: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of Minnesota |citation=34 Minn. 374, 26 N.W. 1 (1885) |date=1885 |subject=Contracts |appealed_from= |case_treatment=No |overturned= |...") |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|appealed_from= | |appealed_from= | ||
|overturned= | |overturned= | ||
|partially_overturned= | |partially_overturned= | ||
Latest revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023
| Thompson v. Libbey | |
| Court | Supreme Court of Minnesota |
|---|---|
| Citation | 34 Minn. 374, 26 N.W. 1 (1885) |
| Date decided | 1885 |
Facts
The plaintiff sold logs to the defendant, and they had a written agreement spelling out the terms of the contract in detail.
Issues
Whether the defendant could proffer evidence of oral agreements which contradicted the written contract.
Holding
The court refused a new trial.
Rule
Where a writing is complete on its face and pertains to the whole agreement, it is acknowledged as a full expression of the agreement of the parties.
