This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Leonard v. Pepsi

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 17:07, June 14, 2023 by DeRien (talk | contribs) (Please delete this page. I migrate my summaries to Leonard v. Pepsico)

Leonard v. Pepsi
Court United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Citation
Date decided August 5, 1999

Facts

Pepsi ran a promotion in the 1990s to encourage consumers to collect "Pepsi points." One of the Pepsi ads shows a boy exchanging 7,000,000 Pepsi points for a Harrier military jet.

Leonard really wanted the Harrier jet. He figured that 7,000,000 Pepsi points would require him to spend $700,000. At the time, disregarding the civilian restrictions from buying a military jet, the cost of the said Harrier jet was $23,000,0000. Thus, it seemed to Leonard like a discount of over $22 million dollars from Pepsi if the ad had been serious.

When Leonard ordered the Harrier Jet, Pepsi officials replied that the advertisement was intended to be humorous and attention-grabbing.

Procedural History

Pepsi sued Leonard in the Southern District of NY seeking declaratory judgment that the Pepsi didn't owe Leonard the jet.

Case Text Links