This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co.

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 15:09, October 20, 2011 by Lost Student (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co.'', 769 F.2d 1284 (7th Cir. 1985). '''Facts''': Plaintiff agreed to build a new bagging system for Defendant under a contract with a liquida...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co., 769 F.2d 1284 (7th Cir. 1985).

Facts: Plaintiff agreed to build a new bagging system for Defendant under a contract with a liquidated damages clause. Defendant breached, and Plaintiff wanted damages according to the liquidated damages clause.

Holding: Held for Defendant.

Reasons: Although Plaintiff is entitled to damages, the liquidated damages clause is unreasonable in that it is disproportionate to the actual loss.

Rule: Damages = contract price - amount saved by non-shipment.