This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1965)

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 16:39, July 9, 2023 by DeRien (talk | contribs)

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1965)
Court US of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Citation
Date decided August 11, 1965
Overturned Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1964)
Followed Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1964)

Facts

Walker-Thomas was a rent-to-own retailer. He considered all payments made by his customers rental payments until the items were paid for in full.

Customer's maintained a cumulative balance of all their items. If a customer purchased a $800 item while still having a $50, then all the customer's purchases would have been regarded as un-paid.

During the period from 1957 to 1962, Ms. Williams had purchased furniture and appliances from Walker-Thomas.

Procedural History

Ms. Williams lost in Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture (1964).

Walker-Thomas also sued another customer seeking to re-possess (writ of replevin) "rented" items because these customers hadn't paid in full under the "cover-all provision" that required all items to have been paid for.

Arguments

The customers of Walker-Thomas argued that the "cover-all provision" was unconscionable.

Case Text Links