This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Sweeney v. Sweeney

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023 by Lost Student (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Sweeney v. Sweeney
Court Connecticut Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided March 6, 1940

Facts

Maurice Sweeney owned a farm in Connecticut. He & his brother John operated a tavern there.

In 1937, the 2 brothers went to the town clerk to record 2 deeds:


  • 1st deed conveyed the tavern to John & was recorded
  • 2nd deed conveyed the farm to Maurice & wasn't recorded.

Maurice Sweeney owned & operated the farm until his death in September 1938.

Upon the death of Maurice Sweeney, his estranged wife who had been named administrator of his estate suddenly showed up & filed a suit to quiet action over the farm.

The transfer of the farm title to Maurice Sweeney stipulated that John must pre-decease Maurice in order for the farm transfer to take place.

Procedural History

John Sweeney wins in the trial court; the deed wasn't delivered to Maurice Sweeney & his widowed wife Maria loses.

Issues

1. Does a signed attestation clause in a deed prove that the deed was delivered?

2. Does attaching a condition to a deed void the transfer of title?

Holding

A signed attestation of deed is enough.

Conditional delivery of deed may be made by placing the deed in the hands of a 3rd party.

Rule

To convey land by deed, a grantor must intend to pass immediate & present title of the land to a grantee.

Case Text Links