This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org

Guth v. Loft

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 17:23, July 16, 2023 by DeRien (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Delaware Supreme Court |date=1939 |subject=Business Associations |facts='''Charles Guth''' was the president of Loft, Incorporated, a major candy c...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Guth v. Loft
Court Delaware Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided 1939

Facts

Charles Guth was the president of Loft, Incorporated, a major candy company in the 1930s. Loft manufactured most of its own syrup except the cola syrup that it would purchase from Coca-Cola.

In 1931, Guth realized that Coca-Cola was charging smaller wholesaler less than his candy company, Loft. Consequently, he as the Loft president decided to switch the cola syrups to Pepsi.

In 1931, Pepsi was going bankrupt; so, Guth purchased the Pepsi formula and trademark while resuscitating Pepsi. Guth acquired his Pepsi interest in his own name instead of Loft. However, Guth used Loft's manufacturing facilities, credit, materials, & employees to further Pepsi business without knowledge of Loft's board of directors.

Procedural History

Loft corporate directors sued Guth and Pepsi. Loft alleged that Guth breached his duty of loyalty by usurping a corporate opportunity.