This site is a developmental version of Wiki Law School. To go to the production site: www.wikilawschool.org
WVU McLaughlin Constitutional Law: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Constitutional Law- McLaughlin- WVU (Spring 2007) moved to WVU McLaughlin Constitutional Law: Trying to follow a standardized naming system) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:20, May 12, 2007
Constitutional Law- McLaughlin
Historical References
- 1215- Magna Charta -->part of British Constitutional Law
- British only have unwritten Constitution, mainly docs and practices... its meaning is created by Parliament; Parliament has been primarily the House of Commons; There is NO JUDICIAL REVIEW in Britain... the final word/review= Parliament
- 1535- Henry VIII- took English Church out of Roman Church & declared himself head of the English Church
- 1627- Petition of Right–>
- 1689- Bill of Rights–> John Locke
- 1776- Declaration of Independence
- 1781- Articles of Confederation
- 1787- Constitution Convention
Writ of Mandamus
a writ sought by an ordinary citizen who says “the govt has a duty to do something that affects me positively, that I want. The Govt has a clear duty under the law to do it, and I want them to do it.”
Doctrine of Judicial Review
Marbury v. Madison (page 3)
Main Question - Who should decide, who should have the final word, as to the meaning of the Constitution?
ANSWER-Constitution Trumps Act of Congress (which came into being by the Constitution)
- Marshall’s opinion acts as if his opinion is plain meaning, not a question of Interpretation Marshall uses Transparent meanings
- Whenever you have a written Constitution, Judicial Review is a plain meaning concept